Upper VI


FORMULA BOOKLET
Lesson Notes
HOMEWORKS
Further Maths HOMEWORKS

Link to revision material for further maths

FOLDER AUDIT FORM
Link to Maths Centre

Past papers and mark schemes.

 Other Stuff:

7 comments:

  1. Question: are the eigenvectors of a symmetric matrix mutually orthogonal? Are they linearly independent? Is this the same thing?

    ReplyDelete
  2. To address the second question, mutually orthogonal vectors are linearly independent, but the converse is not always true.

    To show this, consider a set of non-zero vectors $ \left\{ \mathbf{ x_1}, \mathbf{x_2}, ... , \mathbf{x_n} \right\} $ that are mutually orthogonal, that is, for any $a \neq b$, $\mathbf{x_a} \cdot \mathbf{x_b} = 0$.

    Suppose the set of vectors is not linearly independent. By definition, that would imply that $\mathbf{x_1} = \sum_{i=2}^{n} c_i \mathbf{x_i}$. Now, since $\mathbf{x_1}$ is a non-zero vector, it must be true that $\mathbf{x_1} \cdot \mathbf{x_1} \neq 0$. However,
    $ \mathbf{x_1} \cdot \mathbf{x_1} = \mathbf{x_1} \cdot \sum_{i=2}^n c_i \mathbf{x_i} = \sum_{i=2}^n c_i \mathbf{x_1} \cdot \mathbf{x_i}$ as the dot product is distributive, and hence $\mathbf{x_1} \cdot \mathbf{x_1} = \sum_{i=2}^n c_i \cdot 0 = 0$ which is of course a contradiction, and so the earlier assumption that our vectors were not linearly independent must be incorrect.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Can we have the mark schemes for the solomon papers as well please? That would be really helpful, thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've added all the Solomon papers and mark schemes now. Enjoy

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Sir, I don't suppose you have any D2 notes that you could put up do you? thanks

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm afraid not Kathryn. Have a look at the FMSP website?

    ReplyDelete